![]() ![]() If that alone doesn't convince you to use JMdict, I'm not sure what else will, but there's one more important distinction I'd like to make: EDICT entries contain a very useful tag "P", which I assume stands for "priority" or "popular", because those are considered to be the most common words in the language. of a waterfall) / fall distance (2) difference / gap ![]() (1) (n) difference in elevation (between two points in a body of water) / head / drop (e.g. I mean, what the hell is that even supposed to mean? "Headwaters" is the term for the source of a stream or river.is that what "a head (of water)" means? It has nothing to do with "difference", though, so that's probably not it.for comparison, this is the definition currently given in JMdict: I've been using an Anki deck generated from EDICT2 for just over a year now, and some of the definitions are fairly poor, so I just got in the habit of looking up words I didn't understand on ALC (something I highly recommend no matter what dictionary you use).but eventually I ran into this entry, which finally made me give up on EDICT: This more or less directly causes the second problem: the quality of entries in EDICT2 is much lower than JMdict. I'm sure it was perfectly synchronized with JMdict at that time, but the most recent JMdict was created on. EDICT files are generated from JMdict, so both of them contain almost precisely the same information, but there are a few key differences.įirst, EDICT2 is not maintained very well.the current version of edict2.gz that's held on the official site (as of today, ) was generated on. This is already well-known to many people, but I wish there had been a thread like this a year ago, when I started using EDICT2 hardcore.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |